March 14th, 2010
Survey if you like
Just took a survey on the New York Times Freakonomics blog, on a topic near and dear to my heart, work-family balance. You can take it yourself here, and stay tuned for the results.
Just took a survey on the New York Times Freakonomics blog, on a topic near and dear to my heart, work-family balance. You can take it yourself here, and stay tuned for the results.
Sometimes the most eloquent writing about feminism springs from the minds of men. Backpackingdad hits the nail on the head with this one. He speaks about striving for true gender equality through greater balance not only in the work place but in the home, and highlights how some women may have difficulty letting go of the reigns at the homestead despite the stated desire for equality.
“Part of the job is already being done as fathers step into at-home roles and immerse themselves very successfully. But here they face resistance from not only other men, who resist the changing roles and the infection of the workplace with domesticity. They also face a peculiar sort of resistance from women. Some women view at-home dads in a spectacularly evil light, as sexual prowlers hoping to seduce neighbourhood moms. But even more insidious is the casual assumption that men are buffoons when placed in a domestic role. This assumption, and the dismissal of male competence in the home and with the children, does more, I think, to deter men from stepping into those roles on their own than any pressure from male peers…
… It is subtle misandry, misogyny’s dance partner, and it is an obstacle to the very balance and equality that would help you to never feel that kind of superiority, disappointment, and anger ever again. It is an obstacle to the creation of a class of men who collaborate with you to change social and economic structures that will result in gender equality and improved work-life balance. Think about the converse situation, in which men would congregate to laugh about the sad attempts of the newly “liberated” women to operate in a man’s world. Did it, does it, happen? Yes, I’m certain of it. But it is not something to be tolerated, and it is certainly not something to be lauded. “
Word, ladies. Word.
I enjoyed my first Mother’s Day as a mother a lot more than I thought I would. In the past, I was caught up in the notion that Mother’s Day is a holiday created by card companies to guilt people into buying their products (which isn’t exactly the history of the holiday, just what it has become in some ways - Bust magazine had a great article on the history of Mother’s Day this month, but it’s not online or else I would share it with the group). But it was nice to have strangers wish me a Happy Mother’s Day when I was walking down the street with my little dude, and to feel a part of something bigger that is motherhood and a day to recognize all that that means. I didn’t mind the fancy brunch or mini cupcakes either.
In that spirit, here’s a nice little piece from Livescience about why moms deserve Mother’s Day (as if you weren’t sure - thanks to Rational Moms for the link). It presents a few stats about how hard moms work, and how difficult life can be for them, though I’m left thinking that instead of celebrating the sacrifice once a year, maybe dads could kick it up a notch? But you knew I was going to say that.
Here’s a little essay about why we moms should not be working outside of the home from Opposing Views:
“Raising children is a full-time job, one that dramatically alters the paths women were on prior to becoming mothers. Therefore, working full time while trying to raise young children is impossible. This is not anti-feminist, nor is it a matter of one’s politics. It is just a fact. No matter how much women would like to balance work and family, the endless demands of children don’t allow mothers to dedicate themselves fully to someone or something else. This doesn’t mean mothers must be out of the workforce permanently. But it does mean they’ll need to sequence their lives — plan their lives in such a way that they’ll be able to pursue work and motherhood, but at separate times. Or do them simultaneously when their children are older, as women have historically done.”
There are several good critiques of this argument in the comments section of this post, but I can’t help but add my own. There is no mention of the responsibility of fathers in contributing to the care of their children and the author does not cite any research to back up the “fact” of the assertion that it is impossible to work full-time and raise a child. Certainly, our culture needs to be more supportive of the integration of parenting in general with work outside the home (longer parental leave, for a start). But balancing work and home responsibilities in a meaningful and healthy way is a real possibility. To suggest that women need to stop everything to have kids neglects the fact that many families are not financially able to do so, and that women who want to work are happier and better parents when they are able to do so (which I posted about here). Also, in a country where 50% of marriages end in divorce, allowing for women to have greater financial means and to be less dependent on their husbands will undoubtedly improve their circumstances if and when their marriages end (and similarly, it makes it more possible for wome to feel able to leave bad marriages). In fact, this study found that women’s standard of living actually decreases 27% after a divorce, while for men it increases 10%.
And, I’m sorry, is this 1950? Did we gain nothing from second wave feminism? I can’t believe people still buy into this crap. I’m not arguing that mothers (or fathers, for that matter) should absolutely work outside of the home, but there is not only one good way to raise a child. Like anything, I’m skeptical of either-or arguments, life is way more complicated than that.
Judith Warner wants to ban the breast pump. In this New York Times article, she argues that women who need to be away from their babies for several hours a day should not feel bad about giving their little ones formula and that pumping is an unappealing and inhumane option. I get where she’s coming from, but I’m also all for having options even if they are not optimal. And there are many other reasons why a nursing mother might pump besides guilt or the slight health benefits of breastfeeding that she doesn’t mention, including physical discomfort and the fact that formula is friggin’ expensive. Despite this, she poses some important questions:
“Why, as a society, have we privileged the magic elixir of maternal milk over actual maternal contact, denying the vast, vast majority of mothers the kind of extended maternity leave that would make them physically present for their babies?
Why do we keep sticking our heads in the sand, putting all the burdens of our half-changed society on women – their “choices,” their “priorities,” their bodies – instead of figuring out reasonable ways to make our new family lives work?
Why do we, as women, accept all the guilt and pressure about breast-feeding that comes our way instead of standing up for what we need in order, in the broadest possible sense, to nourish and sustain ourselves and our families?”
Motherload has contributed to the discussion about the Atlantic Monthly article I posted about yesterday, and also followed up with the author who has received lots of positive (amen!) and negative (you are selfish!) responses, prompting her to wonder:
“What does it say about modern mothers, she wonders, that such energy is spent judging how other women feed their children? What are we reflecting about ourselves when we so readily apply the word ’selfish’ to any Mom who doesn’t do things our way? (And why, while we are at it, is it so wrong for a mother to think of herself — and her job and her marriage — first once in awhile?)”
Additionally, those super cool Equally Shared Parenting peeps have responded on Motherload, offering suggestions on how to equally share breastfeeding, including dad taking over other duties or bottle feeding. They also wrote about it on their Equality Blog. At first, it seems logistically impossible, but there is more to a baby’s day than boob time.
And here’s an interesting response to the original article at PhD in Parenting, including how one family kept the balance:
“There are biological differences between men and women (some pleasant and some unpleasant), but accepting those doesn’t mean accepting inequality. If both parents are committed to making an equal contribution (not an equal lack of contribution) to their child’s life, then there is a way to split things up so that breastfeeding doesn’t become an unfair burden on the mother.”
In this post from Mainstream Parenting, the downside of breastfeeding is discussed, prompted by an Atlantic Monthly articlewritten by a mother contemplating the repercussions of exclusively breastfeeding her third child. The original article has a great comparison of the current breast feeding uber mom image to that of Betty Friedan’s “problem that has no name,” a history of the pro-breastfeeding movement, and questions some of the actually underwhelming evidence of the benefits of breastfeeding. And, of particular interest to me, is the discussion of how breastfeeding has the potential of shifting the gender balance of power in the (heterosexual) family:
“We were raised to expect that co-parenting was an attainable goal. But who were we kidding? Even in the best of marriages, the domestic burden shifts, in incremental, mostly unacknowledged ways, onto the woman. Breast-feeding plays a central role in the shift. In my set, no husband tells his wife that it is her womanly duty to stay home and nurse the child. Instead, both parents together weigh the evidence and then make a rational, informed decision that she should do so. Then other, logical decisions follow: she alone fed the child, so she naturally knows better how to comfort the child, so she is the better judge to pick a school for the child and the better nurse when the child is sick, and so on. Recently, my husband and I noticed that we had reached the age at which friends from high school and college now hold positions of serious power. When we went down the list, we had to work hard to find any women. Where had all our female friends strayed? Why had they disappeared during the years they’d had small children?”
I do think there is a way to make breastfeeding work and still feel balance, and so does Estherar at Mainstream Parenting:
“I’m happy to say from experience that it doesn’t have to be this way, if you and your partner acknowledge this and either take steps to correct this imbalance (e.g., Mommy feeds, Daddy changes the poopy diapers) or take care the balance is restored once the baby is weaned or takes bottles of breastmilk. “
But ultimately, as with so much of this stuff, one must practice whatever is right for one’s family. And I’m in support of any such evidence that takes the wind out of the sails of those who judge.
I’ll leave you with another great tidbit from the article:
“The debate about breast-feeding takes place without any reference to its actual context in women’s lives. Breast-feeding exclusively is not like taking a prenatal vitamin. It is a serious time commitment that pretty much guarantees that you will not work in any meaningful way. Let’s say a baby feeds seven times a day and then a couple more times at night. That’s nine times for about a half hour each, which adds up to more than half of a working day, every day, for at least six months. This is why, when people say that breast-feeding is ‘free,’ I want to hit them with a two-by-four. It’s only free if a woman’s time is worth nothing.”
I just came across a lovely post from Rational Moms about one woman’s experience returning to work that resonated a bit with my own experience. Here’s an excerpt:
“We women are known for being too hard on ourselves, and socio-cultural elements influence how we treat ourselves. Whether we’re choosing to go back to work, to stay home, to have one child (You have no idea how many people have asked me whether I want to have more children), to have seven children, to work part-time, to work night shifts, or to work the streets, once you have a baby, everyone is a pediatrician with a degree in child development, and the advice is ever-flowing…
…If you’re one of these women choosing to go back to work, don’t you dare feel guilty about wanting to work, about wanting to retain some semblance of your former identity as you return to the workforce, about wanting to be productive in this manner.”
She speaks to the importance of doing what is best for one’s family without judgement, and of her own understanding of the impact of her decision. Nicely done.
Building on the discussion of the work-family-gender balance, Motherload has posted about how the economic downturn has shifted this balance, as more men have lost jobs than women. In fact, according to the article, a whopping 82% of the newly unemployed are men, because men tend to work in such hard-hit industries as manufacturing and construction, while women are overrepresented in jobs in more stable fields of health care and education.
This of course has resulted in a lot more dads being home, and has had interesting repercussions for the distribution of domestic responsibilities. A leveling of the playing field? Hardly. It turns out, when a woman looses her job, she tends to increase hours spent in childcare, whereas for unemployed men, their childcare time allocation does not change from when they were employed. Craziness.
But I’m not going to buy into the whole men-are-lazy-and-can’t-be-trusted-to-scramble-an-egg explanation of this. After reading some of the comments to this article, it seems that a lot of this may stem from our cultural expectation that men are only worthwhile if they bring home a paycheck, and don’t cancel day care for their kids when they’re unemployed because they don’t want to settle in to their unemployed status. That’s not to excuse someone from not pulling his own weight around the house, but it seems important to look at the larger social context of this situation. Still though, dude, spend some more time with your kids before you have to go back to a 50 hour work week.
You know all of that bellyaching I do about not-so-family-friendly work place policies like short parental leave and lack of support for breastfeeding? Well here’s a group that’s actually doing something about it. Moms Rising is a grassroots organization which is fighting for improvements in maternity and paternity leave, flexible work hours, and better health care and child care for families, among other campaigns. They also have lots of resources for folks fighting the good fight, and an interesting blog to boot.