Breast milk as felony assault


I’ve been trying to think of a way to get back in to this blog thing, and what better way than a hilarious breast milk-related news story?   What I love about this story is not that a drunk lady squirted her milk at a cop, but that her milk was classified as a “bio-hazard,” and she was charged with  felony.  Um, overreaction?  Ok, hilarious may not be the best word, this is really a sad comment on how grossed out we get about breast milk, but I can’t help but laugh at the response and the last sentence of the article.  Hopefully they will cut this lady a little bit of slack, I mean is breast milk any more offensive than saliva?  And what are the charges for spitting at a cop?  I’m sure not as harsh.  Thanks to  STFU, Parents for this one.



The Breast-Feeding Doll


This business about the Breast-Feeding Doll is everywhere (Motherlode, Bust, Opposing Views, to name a few).   If you haven’t heard,  a Spanish company has created a doll that breast-feeds, which will be sold in the U.S. next year.  Not only does the doll make sucking sounds when placed in the correct feeding position, but it is also sold with a halter top complete with flowers where nipples would be, for the would-be mother to wear.  On the one hand, this seems like a reasonable development in the functions that a doll plays, as there are already dolls that can be bottle-fed and diaper-changed.  But there is also a kind of ick factor that I can’t wrap my brain around.  I’m not sure how to describe the ick factor, nor do I think that it is a good argument against something.  I think Motherlode makes the best point, that though breast-feeding is natural and should be normalized,

“there are many other things that are natural for adults that children don’t necessarily need to be mimicking at five, no? “

I guess the question is whether this is one of those things that should be considered “adult,” and it brings up all sorts of things about how we sexualize breasts which are, first and foremost, feeding devices.   The most compelling argument I’ve seen against the doll is that it takes the creativity and imagination out of doll play.  You can have a plain old doll and use your imagination to do all sorts of things to care for it, without it being specifically designed to do it.  But I’m still not sure what to make of this whole thing, and I’m certainly not the only one.



The Anti-Pump Contingent


Judith Warner wants to ban the breast pump.  In this New York Times article, she argues that women who need to be away from their babies for several hours a day should not feel bad about giving their little ones formula and that pumping is an unappealing and inhumane option.  I get where she’s coming from, but I’m also all for having options even if they are not optimal.  And there are many other reasons why a nursing mother might pump besides guilt or the slight health benefits of breastfeeding that she doesn’t mention, including physical discomfort and the fact that formula is friggin’ expensive.  Despite this, she poses some important questions:      

“Why, as a society, have we privileged the magic elixir of maternal milk over actual maternal contact, denying the vast, vast majority of mothers the kind of extended maternity leave that would make them physically present for their babies?

Why do we keep sticking our heads in the sand, putting all the burdens of our half-changed society on women – their “choices,” their “priorities,” their bodies – instead of figuring out reasonable ways to make our new family lives work?

Why do we, as women, accept all the guilt and pressure about breast-feeding that comes our way instead of standing up for what we need in order, in the broadest possible sense, to nourish and sustain ourselves and our families?”   



Breastfeeding for fathers


Motherload has contributed to the discussion about the Atlantic Monthly article I posted about yesterday, and also followed up with the author who has received lots of positive (amen!) and negative (you are selfish!)  responses, prompting her to wonder:

“What does it say about modern mothers, she wonders, that such energy is spent judging how other women feed their children? What are we reflecting about ourselves when we so readily apply the word ’selfish’ to any Mom who doesn’t do things our way? (And why, while we are at it, is it so wrong for a mother to think of herself — and her job and her marriage — first once in awhile?)”

 Additionally, those super cool Equally Shared Parenting peeps have responded on Motherload, offering suggestions on how to equally share breastfeeding, including dad taking over other duties or bottle feeding.   They also wrote about it on their Equality Blog.  At first, it seems logistically impossible, but there is more to a baby’s day than boob time. 

And here’s an interesting response to the original article at PhD in Parenting, including how one family kept the balance:

“There are biological differences between men and women (some pleasant and some unpleasant), but accepting those doesn’t mean accepting inequality. If both parents are committed to making an equal contribution (not an equal lack of contribution) to their child’s life, then there is a way to split things up so that breastfeeding doesn’t become an unfair burden on the mother.”



A new problem that has no name


In this post from Mainstream Parenting, the downside of breastfeeding is discussed, prompted by an Atlantic Monthly articlewritten by a mother contemplating the repercussions of exclusively breastfeeding her third child.   The original article has a great comparison of the current breast feeding uber mom image to that of Betty Friedan’s “problem that has no name,” a history of the pro-breastfeeding movement, and questions some of the actually underwhelming evidence of the benefits of breastfeeding.   And, of particular interest to me, is the discussion of how breastfeeding has the potential of shifting the gender balance of power in the (heterosexual) family:

“We were raised to expect that co-parenting was an attainable goal. But who were we kidding? Even in the best of marriages, the domestic burden shifts, in incremental, mostly unacknowledged ways, onto the woman. Breast-feeding plays a central role in the shift. In my set, no husband tells his wife that it is her womanly duty to stay home and nurse the child. Instead, both parents together weigh the evidence and then make a rational, informed decision that she should do so. Then other, logical decisions follow: she alone fed the child, so she naturally knows better how to comfort the child, so she is the better judge to pick a school for the child and the better nurse when the child is sick, and so on. Recently, my husband and I noticed that we had reached the age at which friends from high school and college now hold positions of serious power. When we went down the list, we had to work hard to find any women. Where had all our female friends strayed? Why had they disappeared during the years they’d had small children?”

I do think there is a way to make breastfeeding work and still feel balance, and so does Estherar at Mainstream Parenting:

“I’m happy to say from experience that it doesn’t have to be this way, if you and your partner acknowledge this and either take steps to correct this imbalance (e.g., Mommy feeds, Daddy changes the poopy diapers) or take care the balance is restored once the baby is weaned or takes bottles of breastmilk. “

But ultimately, as with so much of this stuff, one must practice whatever is right for one’s family.  And I’m in support of any such evidence that takes the wind out of the sails of those who judge.   

I’ll leave you with another great tidbit from the article:

“The debate about breast-feeding takes place without any reference to its actual context in women’s lives. Breast-feeding exclusively is not like taking a prenatal vitamin. It is a serious time commitment that pretty much guarantees that you will not work in any meaningful way. Let’s say a baby feeds seven times a day and then a couple more times at night. That’s nine times for about a half hour each, which adds up to more than half of a working day, every day, for at least six months. This is why, when people say that breast-feeding is ‘free,’ I want to hit them with a two-by-four. It’s only free if a woman’s time is worth nothing.”



Getting fired for pumping?


This post from Slate.com tels the tale of a woman who is suing her former employer for wrongful termination; she claims she was fired for taking a break to pump her breast milk.  This case has made its way to the Ohio Supreme Court and it will be interesting to see how this turns out as it will have ramifications for how such necessary allowances are made for nursing mothers in the workplace.  From the original article in the Dayton Daily News:

“LaNisa Allen, a former general laborer at a Totes/Isotoner Corp. warehouse in West Chester, is suing the company, saying it engaged in illegal gender discrimination by denying her extra restroom breaks to relieve pain caused by breast milk engorgement. She said other Totes workers weren’t required to seek permission for extra restroom breaks to relieve discomfort from menstrual symptoms or the need for frequent urination.

“Allen’s attorneys say it’s gender discrimination because she was fired to relieve discomfort due to lactation, a condition exclusive to women.”

They need to go the route of gender discrimination because apparently, according to the article, employers are not legally required to give breastfeeding women extra breaks.



Salma Hayek and breastfeeding


I find this story about Salma Hayek breastfeeding a baby who is not her own on a trip to Africa really interesting.  First of all, images of women breastfeeding are few and far between in the media these days (PhD in Parenting recently had a great post about this).   And the story has generated a range of responses, from the juvenile (boobies!) to outrage (how disgusting!) to praise (what a humanitarian!)  Here’s a discussion (and here’s another) of  some of the responses and what the story belies about the cultural significance of breastfeeding, and wet nursing, from ABC News who originally broadcasted the story.  And here’s an opinion piece by a pediatrician who is concerned about the health implications of “cross-feeding.”



You can do something about that bellyache


You know all of that bellyaching I do about not-so-family-friendly work place policies like short parental leave and lack of support for breastfeeding?  Well here’s a group that’s actually doing something about it.  Moms Rising is a grassroots organization which is fighting for improvements in maternity and paternity leave, flexible work hours, and better health care and child care for families, among other campaigns.  They also have lots of resources for folks fighting the good fight, and an interesting blog to boot. 

Another good find: this website for Equally Shared Parenting, which I think requires no explanation.   And check our their Equality Blog; they’re talking about the Motherload post I wrote about in my last post.

 



You want my mom to feed me here?


YouTube Preview Image

Thanks to PhD in Parenting for the link to this awesome public service announcement.



Longer paid leaves promote breastfeeding success


Here’s something to add to the duh category (but a valuable finding nonetheless): researchers in California have found that the length of maternity leave seems to be related to how long mothers breastfeed.  As discussed in this article from Baby Center:

“The strongest predictor of whether a woman would continue breastfeeding was whether or not she returned to work within 6 weeks of delivery, the researchers found; those who did were 3.4 times more likely to stop breastfeeding than those who had longer leaves.

The risk of not establishing breastfeeding was also more than doubled among mothers who went back to work between 6 to 12 weeks after delivery compared to the women who were still not working.

Women who were managers, had flexible work schedules, and had more job autonomy were more likely to start breastfeeding their infants, and were more likely to breastfeed longer.”

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends breastfeeding for at least the first year of a baby’s life, but I wonder how much they’re doing to combat the obstacles women face who want to reach this goal.  Maybe it’s beyond their scope, but I find it hopeful when research is published that identifies institutional barriers as the cause of these difficulties rather than individual parents who recieve enough messages that they are not good enough.